![]() ) accessibilism absurdly implies that an infinite regress of facts, each more complex than the last, must be accessible to the subject. I then discuss Ralph Wedgwood’s (2002: 350-352) argument that (. I first show that this phrase may either refer to the very things accessible to the subject, or instead to the facts about which things are accessible to her. ![]() I argue that misunderstandings of accessibilism have hinged on a failure to appreciate an ambiguity in the phrase ‘what is accessible to the subject’. Accessibilism is a version of epistemic internalism on which justification is determined by what is accessible to the subject.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |